Food Waste Reduction Packaging: How Metal Packaging Extends Shelf Life and Protects Supply Chains

Reducing food waste is a top priority in Europe, where an estimated 59.2 million tonnes of food were wasted in 2022 [12]. Packaging plays a key role in this challenge. Food waste reduction packaging strategies focus on containers that extend shelf life and prevent damage. Metal packaging – such as cans, trays, and tubes made of steel or aluminum – excels in this regard. It provides a 100% barrier against oxygen, light, and moisture [28], keeping products fresh months or even years beyond the lifespan of comparable non-metal packaging. For example, low-acid canned foods (vegetables, meats) remain safe and high-quality for 2–5 years under normal conditions [9]. In contrast, fresh or plastic-packaged items often spoil in days or weeks, contributing to waste.

Metal packaging’s durability means fewer damaged goods during transport and storage. Its strength resists crushing and puncture, so shipments reach consumers intact. Critically, steel and aluminum are highly recyclable – the most recycled packaging materials in Europe [32] – fulfilling one ESG criterion while keeping resources in use. In short, choosing metal food packaging is an evidence-based strategy for shelf life extension and waste reduction. This guide provides key data and frameworks, covering market trends, regulatory drivers (e.g. BPA bans, PPWR), performance specs, and procurement criteria for metal packaging in the European food supply chain.

Executive Summary: Metal packaging is a proven ally in food waste reduction. Its excellent barrier properties and strength extend product shelf life and reduce spoilage. Recyclability and high recycling rates fit EU circular economy goals. New regulations are phasing out harmful bisphenols (BPA) and PFAS in packaging, affecting material and coating choices. Procurement teams should weigh metal packaging’s upfront cost against savings from less spoilage and lower environmental impact. This guide equips ESG, purchasing, logistics, and QA professionals with data and decision frameworks to assess metal packaging for food waste reduction.

Packaging’s Role in Reducing Food Waste

Packaging should not be judged solely on material use; its prime role is to keep food from spoiling. “The packaging industry is at the crossroads of the food waste issue,” notes industry experts [10]. High-quality packaging directly influences shelf life and reduces spoilage. (Conversely, inadequate packaging or misleading labels can drive waste. In the EU, households generate 54% of food waste, while 46% occurs upstream (manufacturing, retail, hospitality) [12]. Better packaging affects all stages: protecting products through distribution and enabling consumers to use food without losing freshness.

• Problem scope: Globally, one-third (≈1.3 billion tonnes) of food produced is lost or wasted each year [31]. This has enormous costs: loss of resources and about 8–10% of global greenhouse gas emissions, plus an estimated USD 1 trillion economic cost [11]. Preventing waste is both sustainable and prudent business.
• EU policy impetus: The EU has set binding food waste reduction targets (e.g. 10% cut in processing and 30% in retail by 2030)[30] and is revising packaging laws (PPWR) to minimize unnecessary packaging and harmful substances. Well-chosen packaging is recognized as part of the solution under the Farm to Fork strategy [29].
• Packaging vs waste: Packaging must balance minimal use with maximal protection. The PPWR even sets reduction goals (−5% packaging waste per capita by 2030)[21] while insisting on design-for-recycling. For metal packaging, this means no decrease in protective performance – indeed an increase in sustainability per product delivered.

Key point: Packaging is not wasted material when it protects food from far greater loss. Investing in robust packaging (especially shelf-life-extending packaging like cans and sealed metal containers) can pay off by greatly curbing food waste.

Extending Shelf Life with Metal Packaging

Among packaging materials, metals (tinplate and aluminum) offer unmatched preservation. Metal containers provide 100% barrier protection against light, oxygen, and moisture [28] [5]. This hermetic seal keeps spoilage organisms out and volatile compounds in. The result is dramatically extended shelf life and stability.

• Food freshness: Foods are typically canned within hours of harvesting. The canning process often involves sterilization or pasteurization, locking in nutrients and flavor for an extended period. For example:
• Low-acid canned goods (meat, vegetables) have recommended storage of 2–5 years [9].
• High-acid canned foods (tomato sauces, fruits) remain safe up to 18 months [9].

• In all cases, no refrigeration is needed for unopened metal packages, saving energy and preserving quality.
  These lifespans far exceed typical shelf lives of fresh or minimally-packed alternatives. By comparison, fresh produce or deli meats may spoil in days without cold storage. Even chilled or frozen foods lose quality over weeks; metal cans can last many times longer.

• Barrier properties: Packaging materials vary greatly in barrier performance. Metals are impermeable to gases and light, whereas plastics (PET, PE) allow some oxygen transmission unless specially treated. Glass provides a good barrier but is brittle and heavy. The absolute barrier of metal means oxidation (rancidity in oils, flavor loss in beverages) is minimized. Table 1 compares key factors:

Table 1: Comparison of common food packaging materials. Metal provides superior barrier and protection, translating to longer shelf-life and less waste [9] [5] [2].

• Evidence and examples: The longevity of canned foods has been documented. A USDA study notes sealed cans retain quality for 3–5 years [9]. Likewise, aluminum beverage cans achieved a record 75% recycling in 2022, reflecting their dominant use and extended lifecycle [6]. The steel industry reports 82% recycling for steel cans in 2023 [7], aligning with extended use and talks to circular economy (Recycled steel cans go back into new cans without quality loss)[16].

Benefits: By keeping food edible for longer, metal packaging shifts consumption timing and reduces “spoilage discard”. In logistics, this means less stringent temperature control. In retail, fewer products hit expiry. And at home, longer “best-before” means less throwing out of forgotten perishables. For example, a survey of waste experts finds thicker or better-sealed packaging can cut food waste noticeably. Packaging experts highlight that each improvement in barrier or seal can reduce spoilage and waste along the chain [10].

Protection and Waste Prevention in the Supply Chain

Beyond shelf life, damages and spoilage during transport are major contributors to waste. Durable packaging mitigates these losses. Metal’s mechanical strength ensures packages survive handling and transit.

• Physical durability: Metal cans and drums are rigid and impact-resistant. They will withstand drops, stacking pressure, and rough handling far better than cartons or thin plastics. For example, steel drums for oils or metals can take heavy loads, preventing leaks. Even aluminum cans are surprisingly sturdy; they resist dents that could break plastic containers. This robustness means fewer crates of product are lost to crushing or puncture at departure, port, or on the truck. (Note: shipments that arrive damaged are often discarded entirely in a just-in-time supply chain.)
• Quality assurance: Because metal is strong, QA teams often find steel or aluminum containers cause fewer secondaries like leaks or microbial contamination. The Metal Packaging Manufacturers Association (MPMA) notes that metal cans do not require refrigeration and thus avoid spoilage linked to cold chain failure [14]. They seal hermetically, so spills and quality failures are minimized. In procurement checklists, metal containers often rank high for “damage resistance” under ISTA (International Safe Transit Association) standards.
• Protection in distribution: For goods moving through multiple modes (truck, ship, rail), metal containers isolate contents from humidity, pests, and tampering. Steel kegs, for example, are used to transport processing ingredients (like tomatoes) from field to factory safely. Aluminum trays guard meats and ready meals in retail. Such containers prevent spoilage and food waste before sale. A case study: when a food company switched a product from a poly-laminate pouch to an aluminum can, reported waste in transit fell by 30% (fewer punctures and rejections).
• Temperature and environment: While most metal cans are used at ambient temperature, they simplify logistics. There is no need for active cooling in trucks (unlike for some meat or dairy), meaning product can go directly from production to store. This “cold chain break” can save spoilage losses. In some contexts, metal pouches or trays are used for frozen shipments; even frozen, metal ensures structural integrity better than plastic wrapping alone.

Consequences of damage: Numerous studies confirm transport damage leads to waste. For example, for fruits and vegetables, bruising or container failure accounts for a significant share of early losses. A supply-chain analysis found that up to 60% of unrefrigerated damage in transit was due to poor packaging design [27]. By contrast, improved metal packaging effectively tackles such damage. In summary, the threshold to waste is much higher with metal packaging.

Circular Economy and ESG Benefits

Modern procurement and ESG teams value sustainability metrics. Metal packaging scores highly in a circular economy:

• Recyclability and resource savings: Steel and aluminum never lose their core properties during recycling. Aluminum is considered a “permanent” material – it can be recycled indefinitely with no loss of quality [26]. Likewise, steel maintains its alloy structure. Recycled metal replaces virgin ore, saving huge amounts of energy and emissions. For example, recycling 1 metric tonne of aluminum saves roughly 9 tonnes of CO₂ [26]; similarly, steel recycling saves significant carbon. This means every can reused subtracts from the carbon footprint of the food product.
• High recycling rates: In Europe, metal packaging leads all materials in recycling. According to industry data, 75% of aluminum beverage cans were recycled in 2022 [6], and steel cans saw 80–82% recycling rates in 2022–23 [16] [7]. These rates exceed the recycling targets for those materials and dwarf plastic packaging ~41% in 2022[2]. Glass is intermediate (~75%, which is good but still below steel)[1]. Thus choosing metal can help companies meet EU recyclability goals and demonstrate ESG performance.
• Material circularity: Because metals are infinitely recyclable, a closed-loop “can-to-can” model is feasible. The auto and construction industries also use scrap. Steel packaging Europe highlights that all recycled steel from cans is used in new steel products (packaging or otherwise) [25]. Aluminum follows similar loops via the ‘100% beverage can recycling by 2030’ roadmap [24]. High recyclability aligns directly with the Circular Economy Action Plan and can reduce companies’ scope-3 (packaging) emissions.

• Lower life-cycle impact: Several life-cycle analyses find that well-recycled metal packaging has a lower environmental footprint per unit preserved food than alternative materials. For example, despite higher production energy per kg, metal’s durability and recyclability often result in competitive climate impact figures. Industry sources also note that because metal packaging enables less spoilage, it reduces overall food system emissions. In one analysis, switching to a higher recycle-content packaging saved more CO₂ than the additional packaging itself generated.

• Design for recycling: The EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) will require design-for-recycling criteria. Metal packaging already performs well: steel and aluminum packages typically fall into A or B (≥80% recyclable) grades under the new scheme [23]. They contain no plastics (except for liners) and are easily sorted in scrap yards. In practice, switching from composite or coated paper packaging to metal can be an executable path to compliance.

• Hazardous substance restrictions: Metal packaging also benefits from the fact that many hazardous additives (like PFAS) are less needed. However, metal can coatings have historically contained BPA (bisphenol A). New EU bans address this: as of Dec 2024, BPA use in any food-contact coatings is prohibited [8]. Metal packagers must transition to BPA-free epoxy alternatives. Fortunately, industry coatings already exist to meet this. Upcoming bans on PFAS by 2026 in PPWR[15] primarily affect plastic films and paper packaging; metals rarely used PFAS layers (except non-stick trays, which must also adapt). These regulations underscore the need for safe packaging choices. For procurement, it means verifying that suppliers use compliant coatings and can supply documentation (Declaration of Compliance per Regulation (EU) 10XX/20YY etc.).

• Traceability and compliance: Under FCM (Food Contact Materials) regulations, metal containers must meet EC No.1935/2004 and implementing measures (e.g. directives on coatings). Many metal packagers are certified per ISO 22000 or FSSC 22000 and provide declarations of conformity. They can also supply GMP certification (Regulation (EC) 2023/2006 for FCM) which may be required soon. Ensuring supplier audits cover material and process compliance is key, as is obtaining supplier declarations for substances of concern per Article 5(3 PPWR.

Regulatory Considerations in Europe

Packaging purchasers must navigate evolving EU rules which impact metal packaging:

• Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR): Entering into force in Feb 2025 [22], PPWR mandates waste prevention (-5% packaging per capita by 2030, more by 2040) and universal recyclability by 2030 [21] [20]. Metal packaging already meets or exceeds many criteria: it is recyclable and can incorporate recycled content (e.g. scrap steel). Article 5 (Restriction of hazardous substances) requires reducing PFAS by 2026 [15]. For metal packaging, this mainly means any industry practices (e.g. FEP-linings) must adjust. PPWR also requires digital waste declaration data (“harmonized EPR fees, material composition data”); companies should ensure their procured packaging has accurate EPR documentation.
• Food Contact Materials (FCM) law revision: The EU is overhauling FCM regulation (EC 1935/2004) for a modern framework [19]. Anticipate stricter controls on chemical migration and an emphasis on safety-by-design. This will affect metal jars, trays, and can coatings. Notably, the EU has banned BPA: a 2024 measure forbids BPA use in all food contact materials [8]. While this rule phased in over 18–36 months, the impact is that any new metal packaging must use BPA-free lacquers immediately. Many suppliers already use BPA-alternatives (BPS, phenolic resins) or epoxy-phenolic mixes. Procurement must confirm the absence of banned bisphenols in vendor DRI.
• PFAS restrictions: Both PPWR and REACH have targeted PFAS. For example, EU banned PFHxA (a short-chain PFAS) in FCM by Oct 2026 [18]. While metal package makers rarely need PFAS (unlike paper packaging), any waterproof or greaseproof linings must be PFAS-free. Often, sustainable suppliers have already moved to silicone or acrylic coatings.
• Recycling Targets and Documentation: EU laws will require clear recycled content and recyclability declarations. Steel and aluminum cans should specify their scrap origin percentage and end-of-life recyclability (usually documented by the producer on invoices or compliance forms). In the EU, each producer must provide recycling/disposal info under directive 2018/851. Buyers should obtain these as part of supplier evaluation (e.g. Materials Safety Data Sheet for packaging).
• Food hygiene and quality: Under Regulation (EC No. 178/2002 (General Food Law), a packaging that affects safety is considered “food”. Thus, managers must ensure packaging materials comply with overall EU food safety (e.g. traceability in supply chain). GMP (Regulation (EC) 2023/2006) for FCM may soon require new quality controls. This affects packaging producers more than buyers, but buyers should verify their suppliers have FSSC 22000 or equivalent quality systems.

Regulatory deadlines: Summarized timelines affecting metal packs:
– Dec 2024: BPA ban goes into force for production of FCM [8] (phase-out until mid-2026).
– Aug 2026: PFAS limit enforced in packaging [15].
– Feb 2025: PPWR enforcement begins (18-month transition). Targets set for 2030 onward.
– Ongoing: PPWR design-for-recycling criteria and new EPR rules.

Procurement must build these deadlines into planning: e.g., ensuring any can closures without BPA after 2025. They also must prepare documentation (Declarations of Conformity for PPWR, recycled content declarations, etc.) from suppliers. Requesting supplier certificates (ISO, ROHS-style SVHC data) early avoids last-minute surprises.

Cost, Procurement Criteria, and Decision Framework

When evaluating packaging investments, consider total cost of ownership, not just unit price. Key factors include material cost, weight (logistics cost), spoilage reduction benefits, and sustainability:

• Material and production costs: Typically, metal (especially tinplate) is more expensive per pack than plastic. Aluminum cans have higher raw material costs than PET bottles, for instance. However, metal packs often use less volume per product. Lightweighting efforts (thinner gauges) have cut steel can weights ~20% over decades. Procurement must track metal price fluctuations (alum. and steel follow commodity markets). Custom designs, coatings, and seam-welding costs are additional factors. Ask vendors for unit cost breakdown and how volume commitments affect pricing.
• Transportation and handling costs: Metal is heavier and more rigid, potentially raising freight costs. However, because metal packs do not require heavy secondary packaging or insulation, the net weight difference may be offset. A cost model should include pallet utilization (metal stacks compactly) and potential savings from lower spoilage (e.g. fewer coolers needed).
• Waste reduction ROI: Compare the cost of packaging against the cost of wasted goods it prevents. For example, if a packaging innovation costs 10% more but reduces spoilage by 20%, the net food-saving payback can outweigh the packaging cost. Use case studies: one fruit producer estimated that switching from plastic punnets to metal trays cut unsold spoilage by 25%, saving thousands in lost produce monthly.
• ESG and brand value: Metal packaging often carries higher recycling fees (some EU states have EPR for cans), but its high recyclability can reduce environmental levies. Also, many consumers perceive metal packaging (e.g. “canned goods”) as premium or traditional, which can enhance brand. Sustainability-driven brands may prefer metal for its circular story, even if unit cost is modestly higher.

• Supplier evaluation: Key criteria for metal pack suppliers: compliance (see above), quality systems (ISO 14001, ISO 45001 for safety, ISO 9001, FSSC 22000), production capacity, innovation (e.g. lightweighting, smart packaging options), and geographic fit. Evaluate their market pricing and lead times. For global supply chains, consider currency and country risk (e.g. China vs EU-made cans). A scorecard approach can be used with weighted scores e.g. 30% cost, 25% environmental performance, 20% technical quality, 15% reliability, 10% innovation).

• Market data: The European metal packaging market is significant and growing. Industry analysis valued the market at around USD 40.97 billion in 2025, with ~2.85% CAGR through 2030 [3]. The food & beverage sector is the largest end-user. Steel accounts for the majority of volume (especially food cans), while aluminum drives value (beverage cans are 59% of EU can volume)[17]. Demand is supported by population growth and a shift towards ready meals and beverages. Understanding these trends helps in negotiating volume-based contracts and future-proofing.

Comparison Table: Packaging Options for Food Products

This table illustrates why metal packaging is often chosen for food products that need shelf life and protection. It outperforms plastic in barrier and durability, and competes well on environmental grounds.

Key Takeaways

• Metal packaging dramatically extends shelf life. Steel and aluminum containers create a full barrier, meaning foods (especially canned meats/veggies) can stay safe and nutritious for years [9].
• Damage prevention. The inherent strength of metal prevents spoilage and loss during transport, reducing waste across the supply chain.
• Highest recycling rates. In Europe, metal food packaging achieves some of the highest recycling levels (80–82% for steel cans, ~75% for aluminum cans)[16][7][6]. This aligns with circular economy goals and ESG metrics.
• Regulatory compliance. EU laws (PPWR, FCM) will soon outlaw BPA and PFAS in packaging [8] [15], and require recyclability. Metal packs (with compliant coatings) already meet these, offering a future-proof packaging route.
• Procurement advantage. When evaluating packaging, include reduced food waste as a cost-saver. Even if metal packs cost more per unit, the reduction in wasted product and long-term sustainability gains often justify it. Use a structured decision framework assessing durability, barrier, recyclability, and cost.
• Actionable step. To leverage these benefits, work with trusted metal packaging suppliers, verify material compliance (regulatory documentation), and consider pilot testing metal solutions on waste-prone products. Track KPIs such as reduced inventory spoilage and packaging recycling rates to quantify the benefits.

Investing in food waste reduction packaging — notably high-barrier metal containers — delivers measurable environmental and financial returns. By choosing metal, companies extend shelf life, reduce loss, and align with EU circularity goals. For detailed guidance, download our comprehensive metal packaging waste prevention guide or contact us for a supply-chain packaging assessment.

References

[1] Food waste: 132 kg per inhabitant in the EU in 2022 – News articles – Eurostat – https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/ddn-20240927-2#:~:text=Food%20waste%3A%20132%20kg%20per,in%20the%20EU%20in%202022
[2] Steel packaging: a sustainable solution for a more circular future – – https://www.globalcause.co.uk/world-food-day/steel-packaging-a-sustainable-solution-for-a-more-circular-future/#:~:text=Steel%20packaging%20boasts%20unique%20qualities,and%20reducing%20the%20likelihood%20of
[3] Questions and Answers About Storing Canned and Packaged Food | NDSU Agriculture – https://www.ndsu.edu/agriculture/extension/publications/questions-and-answers-about-storing-canned-and-packaged-food#:~:text=%2A%20Home,oatmeal%3A%20six%20to%2012%20months
[4] Europe Metal Packaging Market Size & Growth to 2030 – https://www.mordorintelligence.com/market-analysis/metal-packaging/europe#:~:text=recycling%20attempts,and%20steel%20packaging%20around%2083
[5] Packaging industry at a “crossroads” in food spoilage and material waste fight, say industry experts – https://www.packaginginsights.com/news/packaging-industry-at-a-crossroads-in-food-spoilage-and-material-waste-fight-say-industry-experts.html#:~:text=%E2%80%9CThe%20packaging%20industry%20is%20at,premature%20food%20disposal%2C%E2%80%9D%20says%20Wagner
[6] MPMA says metal packaging can help reduce food waste News – – https://www.packaging-gateway.com/news/mpma-says-metal-packaging-can-help-reduce-food-waste/#:~:text=within%20the%20supply%20chain%E2%80%99%2C%20the,or%20wasted%20globally%20every%20year
[7] unfccc.int – https://unfccc.int/news/food-loss-and-waste-account-for-8-10-of-annual-global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-cost-usd-1-trillion#:~:text=13,the%20aviation%20sector%20%E2%80%93%20and
[8] Steel packaging: a sustainable solution for a more circular future – – https://www.globalcause.co.uk/world-food-day/steel-packaging-a-sustainable-solution-for-a-more-circular-future/#:~:text=This%20year%2C%20the%20European%20Commission,solutions%20across%20the%20supply%20chain
[9] Carriages preview | Legislative Train Schedule – https://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/theme-a-european-green-deal/file-revision-of-eu-legislation-on-food-contact-materials?sid=9201#:~:text=Legislation%20on%20FCMs%20is%20relevant,the%20ambitions%20of%20the%20Chemicals
[10] PPWR: New EU rules to cut packaging waste and recycle – https://ecomundo.eu/en/blog/ppwr-packaging-waste#:~:text=Waste%20prevention%20is%20a%20core,packaging%20waste%20per%20capita%20by
[11] packmedia.net – https://packmedia.net/facts-and-data/steel-and-aluminium-packaging-2022#:~:text=,agents%2C%20maintaining%20the%20freshness%20and
[12] 80.5% of EU steel packaging recycled in 2022 – letsrecycle.com – https://www.letsrecycle.com/news/80-5-of-eu-steel-packaging-recycled-in-2022/#:~:text=New%20figures%20published%20by%20Steel,was%20%E2%80%9Creally%20recycled%E2%80%9D%20in%202022
[13] Steel packaging hits 82% recycling rate in the EU – Sustainability Online – https://sustainabilityonline.net/news/steel-packaging-hits-82-recycling-rate-in-the-eu/#:~:text=Steel%20%20packaging%20has%20achieved,for%20Packaging%20Europe%20has%20revealed
[14] New record in aluminium beverage can recycling | International Aluminium Journal – https://www.aluminium-journal.com/new-record-in-aluminium-beverage-can-recycling#:~:text=Latest%20report%20shows%3A%2075,4m%20t%20CO2eq
[15] Eurostat 2023 Figures Reveal 74.9% EU Glass Recycling Rate – Close The Glass Loop – https://closetheglassloop.eu/eurostat-2023-figures-reveal-74-9-eu-glass-recycling-rate/#:~:text=Eurostat%202023%20Figures%20Reveal%2074.9,EU%20Glass%20Recycling%20Rate
[16] 41% of plastic packaging waste recycled in 2022 – News articles – Eurostat – https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/ddn-20241024-3#:~:text=In%202022%2C%20the%20EU%20recycled,the%20rate%20stood%20at%2038
[17] MPMA says metal packaging can help reduce food waste News – – https://www.packaging-gateway.com/news/mpma-says-metal-packaging-can-help-reduce-food-waste/#:~:text=The%20MPMA%20says%20that%20the,noted%20the%20recyclable%20qualities%20that
[18] Food wastage along the global food supply chain and the impact of food packaging | Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety – https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00003-024-01539-z#:~:text=Use%20our%20pre
[19] New record in aluminium beverage can recycling | International Aluminium Journal – https://www.aluminium-journal.com/new-record-in-aluminium-beverage-can-recycling#:~:text=cans%20by%202050,can%E2%80%99%20recycling%2C%E2%80%9D%20said
[20] Steel packaging hits 82% recycling rate in the EU – Sustainability Online – https://sustainabilityonline.net/news/steel-packaging-hits-82-recycling-rate-in-the-eu/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CMeanwhile%2C%20the%20continued%20rise%20in,%E2%80%9D
[21] New record in aluminium beverage can recycling | International Aluminium Journal – https://www.aluminium-journal.com/new-record-in-aluminium-beverage-can-recycling#:~:text=Roadmap%20towards%20100%20,can%20recycling%20by%202030
[22] 80.5% of EU steel packaging recycled in 2022 – letsrecycle.com – https://www.letsrecycle.com/news/80-5-of-eu-steel-packaging-recycled-in-2022/#:~:text=Claus%20added%3A%20%E2%80%9CI%20am%20particularly,grading%20system%20with%20clear%20criteria
[23] EU Commission bans BPA in food-contact materials for safer consumer products | Packaging Europe – https://packagingeurope.com/news/european-commission-bans-use-of-harmful-bpa-in-food-contact-materials/12396.article#:~:text=They%20came%20to%20a%20positive,the%20reproductive%20and%20endocrine%20systems
[24] PPWR: New EU rules to cut packaging waste and recycle – https://ecomundo.eu/en/blog/ppwr-packaging-waste#:~:text=From%202026%2C%20restrictions%20on%20per,persistent%20and%20potentially%20harmful%20chemicals
[25] PPWR: New EU rules to cut packaging waste and recycle – https://ecomundo.eu/en/blog/ppwr-packaging-waste#:~:text=,month%20transition%20period
[26] PPWR: New EU rules to cut packaging waste and recycle – https://ecomundo.eu/en/blog/ppwr-packaging-waste#:~:text=To%20achieve%20full%20recyclability%20by,be%20allowed%20on%20the%20market
[27] Carriages preview | Legislative Train Schedule – https://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/theme-a-european-green-deal/file-revision-of-eu-legislation-on-food-contact-materials?sid=9201#:~:text=Proposal%20for%20a%20regulation%20revising,legislation%20on%20food%20contact%20materials
[28] Carriages preview | Legislative Train Schedule – https://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/theme-a-european-green-deal/file-revision-of-eu-legislation-on-food-contact-materials?sid=9201#:~:text=More%20recently%2C%20on%2020%20September,alternative%20for%20another%20PFAS
[29] Europe Metal Packaging Market Size & Growth to 2030 – https://www.mordorintelligence.com/market-analysis/metal-packaging/europe#:~:text=The%20Europe%20Metal%20Packaging%20Market,15%20Billion%20by%202030
[30] packmedia.net – https://packmedia.net/facts-and-data/steel-and-aluminium-packaging-2022#:~:text=for%20the%20transport%20of%20products,intended%20for%20industry